<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to format with FAT32 when Windows XP will not let you</title>
	<link>http://esaba.com/blog/2008/how-to-format-with-fat32-when-windows-xp-will-not-let-you</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 18:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: J Bokelman</title>
		<link>http://esaba.com/blog/2008/how-to-format-with-fat32-when-windows-xp-will-not-let-you#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator>J Bokelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 23:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://esaba.com/blog/2008/how-to-format-with-fat32-when-windows-xp-will-not-let-you#comment-93</guid>
		<description>The integrated format command may supports specifiying filesystem type for volumes larger than allowed, but i haven't tried it: I keep a windows 98 bootdisc around for making "illegally" large fat32 partitions. Microsoft's planned obsolescence scheme makes cross-platform (or other reasons for having large fat32 discs) annoying. If you have a osX mac around you can do it there as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The integrated format command may supports specifiying filesystem type for volumes larger than allowed, but i haven&#8217;t tried it: I keep a windows 98 bootdisc around for making &#8220;illegally&#8221; large fat32 partitions. Microsoft&#8217;s planned obsolescence scheme makes cross-platform (or other reasons for having large fat32 discs) annoying. If you have a osX mac around you can do it there as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
